One of the images, at the upper right, even shows a triple crater formation seperated by two straight lines, which is a definite proof that each straight line is not a one in a million shot. These images show that the straight line in between a double crater formation is not a coincidence. All these images show double crater formations with a straight line in between the two craters. Of the next four images below three were taken on Mars, one (lower right) was taken on Ceres (dwarf planet). But one can easily come to the conclusion that it is not a coincidence just by looking at the rest of the surface of Mars, the moon or other planets. These two impacts might have happened many years apart from one another, but even when the impacts happen almost simultaneously, one would still expect either a crater formation like the one in the left image, or one whose center line is more chaotic / less well defined.Īfter seeing both these images, one with a straight line and one that does not have a straight line in between the two craters, it is still a legitimate thought that the first photo showed a double crater with a perfect straight line because it was a one in a million shot, a pure coincidence. The line in between the two craters is now bend towards the larger crater hole. In this double crater you can clearly see that the large impact happened before the smaller impact, because the smaller crater forms a full circle.
This left image shows what we would more or less expect to see in a double crater formation. Image by ESA/Space-X under CC BY-SA 3.0 license
0 kommentar(er)
